定位艏型自航绞吸挖泥船船尾型线及其伴流场对比评估

Comparison and assessment of aft hull lines and their wake field for self-propelled cutter suction dredger with positioning-type bow

  • 摘要: 【目的】定位艏型自航绞吸挖泥船船尾型线一般采用双呆木或双尾鳍形式,不同船尾型线具有不同的流场特性。针对这两种船尾型线,包括裸船体及增加导管应用场景,开展船尾流场对比分析和螺旋桨激振特性评估。【方法】采用计算流体力学(Computational Fluid Dynamics,CFD)方法,开展了KVLCC2标准模型数值计算验证;在此基础上,对比分析了这两种型线方案的船尾流场特性,评估了伴流场不均度及其对于螺旋桨激振特性的影响。【结果】结果表明,在设计航速处,无论是裸船体还是增加导管,双呆木方案的伴流场不均匀度要优于双尾鳍,前者螺旋桨激振特性较后者优46.0%;相对于裸船体,增加导管后,螺旋桨激振特性改善了约9.0%。【结论】研究结果对同类船型的型线设计和螺旋桨激振评估和优化具有一定的参考价值。

     

    Abstract: ObjectivesThe aft hull lines of self-propelled cutter suction dredgers(CSD) with a positioning-type bow typically adopt either a twin deadwood or twin skeg, as different stern designs exhibit distinct flow field characteristics. For these two stern lines, including the bare hull and the duct-equipped case, a comparative analysis of the stern flow field and an evaluation of propeller excitation characteristics were conducted. MethodsBy CFD method, numerical validation was performed on the KVLCC2 standard model. Based on this, the two stern line designs were compared, focusing on their stern flow field properties, wake field uniformity, and the impact on propeller-induced vibrations. ResultsThe results indicate that, at the design speed, the twin deadwood plan is judged to be better than the twin skeg in terms of wake field uniformity, by 46.0% in terms of propeller excitation characteristics. Additionally, the duct integration improved propeller excitation characteristics by about 9.0% compared with bare hull. Conclusions These findings provided valuable insights for hull lines designing and propeller vibration assessment and optimization of similar vessel.

     

/

返回文章
返回